On 2011-05-02, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On 2-5-2011 3:15, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:58:59AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> [...] >>> my fear is also that while the extensive branch usage is superior from >>> the geeky point of view, its hindrance for people not so technically >>> skilled. do we want only geeks to be around? >>> [...]
> I don't really get this. When used to it, I don't think it is > technically a very difficult workflow. Maybe it's a rather psychological barrier, maybe branches are no longer complicated things with Git, but the "when used to it" is IMO the point: people not used to it will be scared by 5...60 branches. > Second, does that mean that the less skilled developers are only > allowed to do small things and refrain from the larger features because > they don't know how to use the branches ? At least, they would not have to learn branches even for small features. ... > I saw that even a lot of small commits, were either corrected adjusted > etc. several times. Do I undestand right, that with Git it would be possible to do this corrections/adjustments without spoiling the history -- also if no branches are used? Then, moving to Git would be helpfull even without changing the rest of the workflow. Günter
