On 26/04/2011 7:28 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On 26-4-2011 20:14, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 26/04/2011 4:59 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
It would be possible to use svn/git together for one release cycle. I've
been maintaining a git repo parallel to the svn repo for the last few months.
However, everyone needs to become used to using git, we need to decide on
a place to host the git repo, the maintainer needs to design a appropriate
workflow that we all agree on.
I don't feel the need to move to git. At all.
If you think of moving to git because of branch management, I would
strongly caution against that. Branches are too much burden. You want
to avoid them at all costs. The simple fact that git encourage them
makes me want not to approach it.
It's difficult to have a nice discussion if you start off like this,
but I'll try.
I might have sounded too harsh. I am sorry if I have this aversion
towards git. You did a very nice job of explaining your reasoning. I'll
try to come back at some of the points, but I cannot right now.
This discussion is very useful by the way. What's wrong with the current
and what would be better. These topics transcend just git vs svn.
[...]
I hope this explained my interpretation of the git philosophy.
Vincent
It did. Thanks
Julien
