On 03/29/2011 09:29 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Yes, that's a sensible suggestion. I'm not at all sure why I did it the other way. Probably because I didn't think of this option?On 29/03/2011 2:46 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:However, is it possible to use "non-image" equation numbers also with "math images"? Seems like the better method anyway.GünterEverything's possible. Seems to me the better method too. Please can we have other opinions on this?
Richard