On 28/03/2011 4:45 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
I see, so we'd have to regenerate these quite often. So perhaps removing
the numbers is the right way to go, anyway.
In 1.6, if I remember right, one always just gets (1) as the equation
number, which is also kind of useless. But it does at least indicate
that the equation is numbered. But there must be some other way to do
that, e.g., to write a "(#)" at the end of the snippet.
It looks like the mechanism has been put into 2.0 to get the numbering
right when instant preview is turned off. It certainly could be done
with previews, too. Short of that, I personally like (#) better than all
(1)'s. But until there is consensus on what to do, I wouldn't touch it.
--
Julien
