On 05/02/2011 15:07, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/05/2011 06:51 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I'm guessing the answer at this point is "No", in which case using
lyxpak.py to export may still be a good idea for 2.0.
for sure i have no problem including it in the tarball.
If I'm not mistaken, it is already in the tarball.

I don't think it is.
for the conveter i'm more pessimistic - i guess its only half baked
thing without proper testing
Your guess is wrong.

It's a very sophisticated script, in fact. How extensively it has been tested, I do not know, but I've used it to build archives of stuff myself and I am certain it is much more reliable than many of the other converters we configure.

As I've said, I think a bundled format is also a good idea, but this is a good solution for people who need such a thing now.

I really don't think the two things are in competition.

lyxpak: pack everything necessary for compilation, for easy backup and easy sending.

bundled format: designed for easy document exchange and collaboration without having to move/zip multiple files.

That being said, Vincent embedded-files branch seems to be doing the same thing as lyxpak (I haven't read the code). Vincent's approach is probably better longer term as it does not depend on the lyx file format. Anyway, this does not mean that lyxpack is not correct. And at this point of development lyxpack is definitely the best approach and it working now without touching any C++ code; so the regression risk is very low...

Abdel.



Reply via email to