Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 19.01.2011 17:24, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Peter Kümmel wrote: >>> This solves not the problem you've described because this is more >>> complicated, but at least the locks are gone. >> >> i was looking at your primal converters patch and came to the conclusion >> that the changes which allowed converters varibale to be local inside >> buffer could solve rest of the issues. > > I'm not sure I understand you here. Do you say, at some places we should > copy the Converters: > Converters converters = theConverters();
yes. and some place == buffer export as it was in the original patch. does it make sense? pavel
