On 11/17/2010 03:48 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
As regards the other isxxx() tests, I suggest to audit them on an as needed basis, according to what the posix standard says: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/mindex.html (click on the "Alphabetic index" link at the bottom for accessing the relevant man page).
Both those were ones I introduced, ignorant as I am about these sorts of issues. So I've fixed them both, I think, but I'd appreciate if you'd have a look at r36351. Richard
