On 2010-02-01, José Matos wrote: > On Friday 29 January 2010 22:38:05 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> So I propose to rename it to 0.19 because we have always evolved and > never had any real revolution. We had the transition to Unicode but missed it (version number wise). > LyX 1.6.x is a different beast from 1.0.0 and yet you insist to have > the same initial number. The change to a new major number is longer > overdue. In my view, it does not make sense to "jump" from 1.6 to 2.0. Even if there are new features, there is also continuity in the base code. I'd wait with 2.0 for the XML file format, as even if not seen by the average user, this is a change at the very base and the numbe scheme can serve to highlight this "hidden" revolution. Günter
