On Monday 01 February 2010 06:44:29 José Matos wrote: > On Monday 01 February 2010 11:17:54 Peter Kümmel wrote: > > I don't insist on 2.0. I only think to make the jump to 2.0 now is > > without a reason. We missed the chance to name it 2.0 when releasing > > 1.6, so why should we do it now. Assume we introduce a new > > file-format,would we relase 3.0 then? > > Nope. The change for xml is internal and its value comes from the > possibilities it opens. If all goes well, as we intend, the user should not > notice any visual difference.
Depends on the user. A lot of us read and create LyX programmatically or with a text editor. SteveT Steve Litt Recession Relief Package http://www.recession-relief.US Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt
