On Monday 01 February 2010 11:17:54 Peter Kümmel wrote: > I don't insist on 2.0. I only think to make the jump to 2.0 now is without > a reason. We missed the chance to name it 2.0 when releasing 1.6, so why > should we do it now. Assume we introduce a new file-format,would we relase > 3.0 then?
Nope. The change for xml is internal and its value comes from the possibilities it opens. If all goes well, as we intend, the user should not notice any visual difference. What I am arguing is that the perceived changes can not be the only to change the version number. In that sense I like the methodology followed for firefox. > But don't get me wrong, I don't care that much on the version number. I'm > glad we don't start something like LyX 02.2010. My rambling is not directed at you. :-) > Peter -- José Abílio
