Hello On 9/6/09, John McCabe-Dansted <gma...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not sure that it is appropriate to cite LyX under normal > circumstances. > > After all, if we cite LyX, we could cite LaTeX as well, and come to > think of it my TCP/IP stack > Talking of TCP/IP.. [1]
> is also a important part of my workflow > when writing and submitting papers. I could probably make a case for > citing most of the 2448 packages that are listed by "dpkg -l", but > then it would be hard to fit within the page limit. > LyX would still be far more important to the final result than, say, your display manager. However I mostly agree with your reasoning: it would be strange to see academic papers cite LyX. Still, there would be cases where the design is important, say, in books. If a book (or any other work, say, a poster) was designed/created with LyX and the author wants to give credit, it would be nice for her to have an out-of-box solution. Best Liviu [1] http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14391822
