Alex Fernandez wrote: > Then you have not understood my proposal: I don't want to clutter the > menu at all. Tell me, how many HTML converters do you currently have > on your machine?
I think 4 or 5. > If the answer is 0 or 1, you would get exactly the > same entries as you already have: 0 or 1. Only if the user has more > than one HTML converter, then they would get more than one entry. My > understanding is that this is important for them (as it was for me). Most converters come with TeXLive. I have a full install, so they are just there. > > * Propagate the menu with only what you think is useful/what you need > > (namely, HTML, but not CJKLyX or all LateX->RTF converters, for instance) > > Again you have misunderstood me: I don't care about CJKLyX and they > don't bother me. Same for RTF. So it's the first alternative: * Clutter the menu with all converters we have, of which many users will not need many alternatives > In fact as I said I don't have an issue > with clutter -- it's nice to know what you can preview or export to. But I have an issue with clutter. > > Exactly. You propose a "make it work for me" solution. This is where I > > disagree. > > I am not the only one requesting the feature, so it's rather "make it > work for me and for everyone else who is requesting it, while not > annoying the rest of the world". And exactly the "not annoying the rest" is the very point. > Your proposal meanwhile is "do the > dirty work I won't bother to do". I did not say I don't bother to implement it. I said I do not have time at the moment to finish what I've started. But I also proposed my help. > Not sounding good so far, Jürgen ;) I'm sorry if you read it that way. Jürgen
