On 08/15/2009 01:25 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
I think we've done pretty well here. We said a while ago we wanted to do
two things: (i) Make it impossible completely to hide dirty buffers;
(ii) Protect against dataloss from destroying dirty buffers. I think we
did both, and Vincent did some nice cleanup along the way.
I agree. But given that we are two bug fixes and probably only some days away
from the release, such a change bears risk. (actually, I also wanted to avoid
that it introduces new UI strings, since many translators already submitted
the final version of the po files after this [maybe a bit too optimistic] post
of mine: http://marc.info/?l=lyx-docs&m=124999617916368&w=2)
Maybe the thing to do is not include it for 1.6.4, but commit it as soon
as 1.6.4 is out, so that it gets tested. I doubt that terribly many
people get bit by this bug. Not to say it isn't important, but we don't
want to make things worse...
rh
