On 08/15/2009 12:42 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
This has been done for trunk at r31056 and r31057. Up to you if you want
it for branch, Jurgen. I don't know that it is absolutely necessary.
It's just a safety net.
Let's see first how the general solution evolves.
(I hope the whole thing does not get too complex).
I think we've done pretty well here. We said a while ago we wanted to do
two things: (i) Make it impossible completely to hide dirty buffers;
(ii) Protect against dataloss from destroying dirty buffers. I think we
did both, and Vincent did some nice cleanup along the way.
rh
