Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> writes: > > - introduce actvation/deactivation through the context menu > > (2 JMarc - i tried your proposal through branch-activate lfun, but > > when i come to thepoint when i needed to copy the whole code from > > next-inset-toggle lfun i returned to the idea of enhancing > > our own inset-toggle.) > > With the following patch, which _seems_ to work with inset-toggle and > already simplifies stuff, it would be trivial to implement.
can you elaborate a bit more? somehow i don't see how is this related to the previous patch. > if the approach is > considered to be sound. i would be happy to get rid of next-inset-toggle. have you tested, the situations like inset-toggle inside some inset and just before another collapsable one? wasn't next-inset toggle also somehow used for labels/crossreferences? pavel
