Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >>> Why not branch-new-insert ? This one can fire branch-new. >>> >> >> now you are talking about lfun or parameter name? >> > LFUNs yes.
hmm i somehow didn't like the overpopulation - we would have branch-insert, branch-new-insert, branch-new. pavel ps: i have limited access to net now, so i wont be much responsive in the days around.