Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>> Why not branch-new-insert ? This one can fire branch-new.
>>>     
>>
>> now you are talking about lfun or parameter name?
>>   
> LFUNs yes.

hmm i somehow didn't like the overpopulation - we would have
branch-insert, branch-new-insert, branch-new.

pavel

ps: i have limited access to net now, so i wont be much responsive
in the days around.

Reply via email to