Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 25-Sep-2000 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > I'm not sure when this problem crept in because I have not printed
> > anything for a few days now.
> > I guess, however, it is related to changes I made in language.C
>
> I did not see that you removed english from the language file, otherwise
> I would have put it back :). Obviously I added it as:
>
> { "english", N_("English"), false, &iso8859_1, "en" },
>
> (and not N_("American") ;)
The reason I used "American" is that Aspell points english to a short
American
dictionary.
>
> BTW.: did you notice that I changed your french canadian to frenchc
> as in your file you had a double "canadian" language and this
> is no good. If you want I also change "canadian" (for english)
> to "englishc", but that is for canadian to decide (I guess there
> will be different opinions depending if the Canadian is from
> Quebeq or the rest of Canada :)
>
> Jürgen
Did you notice that french spell canadian canadien and so did I.
^
I noticed that canadien was gone, but had not been aware of the
connection between language.C and babel. Babel does not have canadian or
canadien or acadian or frenchc or englishc. I think Lars' removal of
no_babel from buffer.C is what caused usepackage{babel} to go into the
the .tex file.
The problem is how to get things coordinated with aspell.
Garst
