Lars leered, > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > Other options is to use: > | > C-c C-m or C-c m > | Too long. > Say that to thousends of emacs users. vile heretics, all :) more seriously, the insanely long keystrokes are a major reason that I tend to vi rather than emacs. *everything* should be mapped to quick sequences. It's friday; that means I can call emacs users vile heretics, can't I? > It is only in your mind. It's my fingers. More keystrokes leads to less typed output. hawk, who still needs to file bug reports on mkdir and rmdir, as any commands that important should only be two letters . . . --
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Jules Bean
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Dekel Tsur
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Dekel Tsur
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) hawk
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Andre Poenitz
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) hawk
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Kayvan A. Sylvan
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Allan Rae
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Andre Poenitz
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Allan Rae
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Amir Karger
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) John Levon
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) John Levon
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) Allan Rae
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) hawk
- Re: I'm back, take 2 :) hawk