Bo Peng wrote:
I've only skimmed these threads (actually, I've been trying to avoid
them...).
If you do, especially if you have read my last email on that thread
which quotes lots of correspondences, you would have found that my
proposal has been clearly stated and Richard has been illusive. It was
actually fun to go through what he had said and quote them.
This debate would have been a lot easier if you had made a lot fewer
comments of this type. And for what it's worth, the word is "elusive".
I'm sorry if it bothers you that I'm open to discussing the details of
"my" approach, rather than deciding in advance how I think it should
work and then opposing any attempt by anyone else to improve it because
it would hurt my pride to admit someone else might have had a better idea.
Has anyone else noticed how few people are willing to expose themselves
to this kind of treatment?
rh
