On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 06:09:27PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 03:00:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I don't want to use the same LDFLAGS used to build Qt, for example, as > > > in this case I would lose the debug info, whether or not I want it. > > > > OK, so we should ignore Qt LDFLAGS. > > Possibly. I'll let you decide what is better as I can find easy > workarounds. > > > > Then, I have to point configure to the build dir, but should also > > > have installed Qt, as the spotted directories are the installation > > > ones. Needless to say that I find all of this very inconvenient. > > > Moreover, I don't think that this is cygwin specific. > > > > But if you point it to the installation dir, does it work? > > Yes, as I wrote. The point is that the configuration depends on the > existence of the "default" symlink and, depending on packaging, it > may be present or not.
Well, I am too lazy to check on non-*nix, but if it hasn't the 'default' symlink, it's not Qt. Andre'
