On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 12:08:30AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:47:26PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Well, I am too lazy to check on non-*nix, but if it hasn't the > > 'default' symlink, it's not Qt. > > So the Qt3 cygwin package is not Qt: > > $ echo $QMAKESPEC > /usr/lib/qt3/mkspecs/cygwin-g++ > $ ls -lF /usr/lib/qt3/mkspecs/ > total 0 > dr-xr-x---+ 2 root none 0 Apr 17 2007 cygwin-g++/ > $ > > and that's all. It behaves very similar to Qt3, though.
There's nothing wrong with some piece of software behaving like Qt 3. It's a similar issue like Redhat's "gcc 2.96" which pretty much behaved like gcc in most circumstances... Andre'
