On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 06:04:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > This test needs to be done after checking for X, though.
>
> There is no check for X anymore :) Either the qt version was designed
> for X, either it was not...
I mean that "configure --help" still says:
Optional Packages:
--with-PACKAGE[=ARG] use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
--without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)
and this code snippet:
-without-* | --without-*)
ac_package=`expr "x$ac_option" : 'x-*without-\(.*\)'`
# Reject names that are not valid shell variable names.
expr "x$ac_package" : ".*[^-._$as_cr_alnum]" >/dev/null &&
{ echo "$as_me: error: invalid package name: $ac_package" >&2
{ (exit 1); exit 1; }; }
ac_package=`echo $ac_package | sed 's/[-.]/_/g'`
eval with_$ac_package=no ;;
should set with_x=no when specifying --without-x to configure.
Am I right?
> Are you sure that we need that?
Actually, there's no Qt4/X11 on cygwin, but I think that sooner or
later there will be. In this case, we need to know whether specifying
--spec=cygwin-g++ or --spec=cygwin-g++-win32. If I am wrong about
--without-x, there is another way to distinguish the two cases, but
needs a bit more code. BTW, isn't there a X11 version for the Mac,
or, would it be possible to build such a version?
--
Enrico
