> > > > this is _far_too_high_ and i suggest we should still go down with > > > > the number of maxclients; there is no point in allowing 24 apaches > > > > when their only work is swapping the whole box to death. > > > > > > > > i have observed that 8 processes are able to qork on some 0.x load, so > > > > this is > > > > the lower bound and i would say lets put the higher bound somewhere > > > > between > > > > 12-15. > > > > > > Shall we do something about > > > MaxRequestsPerChild 50 > > > > if i understand it correctly this parameter will speed up return to normal > > (<=8) number of > > childern and its point is mainly preventing memory leaks. > > i would be also interested what will happen with our todays graph if you > decrease the number > of spam childern by one.
seeing the evolution today both spamd(500mb vss) and httpd(800mb vss) got completely crazy. JMarc, do you see some problem with the lowering of both services childern? please at least restart them, aussie is unusable the whole day and both services seem get into mutual lockup. thanks, pavel
