> > > I guess LFUN_FILE_NEW was supposed to work with the lyx server. I > > > don't know why LFUN_BUFFER_NEW is not used instead. Wait until an old > > > dev gives an opinion ;-) > > > > I guess it does not matter as long as it is possible to pass the name > > of the file as argument. > > i will delete it then.
i have overlooked "// for scripting purposes" in lfuns.h. so before this removal last question - do you see how LFUN_FILE_NEW could be more usable than LFUN_BUFFER_NEW wrt scripting so there is some reason for keeping this? pavel
