> > > > i have overlooked "// for scripting purposes" in lfuns.h. so before > > > > this > > > > removal last question - do you see how LFUN_FILE_NEW could be more > > > > usable than > > > > LFUN_BUFFER_NEW wrt scripting so there is some reason for keeping this? > > > > > > I do not know... I see it takes two arguments, but I am not sure what > > > they are. > > > > filename and templatefile. > > > > another option could be that instead of direct removal, we can put it > > into some #if 0 and let the removal for 1.7 unless some user start > > screem for the particular lfun... > > Could they be merged?
i dont see what you want to merge on them. in another words i dont see anything what LFUN_FILE_NEW do what LFUN_BUFFER_NEW is not able. pavel
