On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:30:54PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > i have overlooked "// for scripting purposes" in lfuns.h. so before this > > > removal last question - do you see how LFUN_FILE_NEW could be more usable > > > than > > > LFUN_BUFFER_NEW wrt scripting so there is some reason for keeping this? > > > > I do not know... I see it takes two arguments, but I am not sure what > > they are. > > filename and templatefile. > > another option could be that instead of direct removal, we can put it > into some #if 0 and let the removal for 1.7 unless some user start > screem for the particular lfun...
Could they be merged? Andre'
