> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, rgheck wrote: > > > >>> looking at the RES memory usage, the main consumers are these. what if > >>> we start by running less childerns of spamd? > >>> > >>> 59m 2:32.53 spamd 57m 0:52.08 spamd > >>> 37m 1:48.72 spamd > > > > Do we even need 'spamd'? I mean, does it serve a useful purpose on > > aussie?
i guess its purpose is to filter spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] address and not doing this filter would mean megabytes of disk space on aussie every day because many people dont forward their mails etc. > We should check on which addresses it is run. I suspect there is one > instance per mail address... afaik spamd has fixed number of childs (here 3); so its just to change this parameter in config. pavel
