[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, rgheck wrote: > >>> looking at the RES memory usage, the main consumers are these. what if >>> we start by running less childerns of spamd? >>> >>> 59m 2:32.53 spamd 57m 0:52.08 spamd >>> 37m 1:48.72 spamd > > Do we even need 'spamd'? I mean, does it serve a useful purpose on > aussie?
We should check on which addresses it is run. I suspect there is one instance per mail address... JMarc
