Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> So now we have to be careful not to use methods that have the same
>> names of methods from std:: (even the one we do not know about),
>> right?
>
> yes, lyx::support::abort and ::abort, and the other was a conflict
> between lyx::split and lyx::support::slit, but nothing we don't know.

It is a little bit less annoying than I thought, then.

JMarc

Reply via email to