Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, not really as you can always specify the one you desire to use > (egg. support::abort()). This was mostly the case previously anyway, > the difference is that it is now mandatory to clearly specify which > version you want. But it is of course a much saner approach anyway to > avoid creating methods with the exact same signature (name + > argument). If the arguments differs you can use the same name as in > std safely.
The difference is that before it would _never_ happen behind one's back, since we had to import from std:: explicitly. And the suggestion of not using the same signatures as in STL function looks a bit like a joke. Shall I keep a printout of the standard handy just in case I want to create a new function and have to check its name? JMarc
