On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 02:05:37AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Uwe, the problem is that you happily bash others with harsh manners, > > so you should not be surprised when you are paid with the same money. > > Please, don't give me lessons about gentlemanliness when there are > > posts in the archives demonstrating what a gentleman you are. > > What do you mean? The only time I lost my contenance was when I attacked > Edwin, which was not fair > and he kindly accepted my excuse. The rest were maybe hard, but fair > discussions.
Of course, there are different kind of sensibilities and email is the right medium to outrage someone's without actually wanting to. Apparently, you are able to hurt me easily. > I prefer to speak out what I don't like than to laugh on somebody without > letting him know why. I don't think I ever laughed at you, but if you think I someway did, then I have no problems to apologize for that. > But anyway, > > > See, you still have a global variable but nonetheless you introduce > > two accessor functions to set and get its value, when it can still > > be freely referenced from everywhere. > > I see. This code is not mine and I still don't know enough how correctly make > it better and define > aa tex2lyx class. Angus proposed a possible solution, but I wont have the > time to implement this > now. It would help if Peter, Angus, Abdel, you or whoever could do this. It > seems for you it is only > some minutes, for me hours that I don't have. > > This could be the start of a general tex2lyx cleanup and lead to the real > goal to have Unicode also > for tex2lyx. Due to the lack of Unicode, LyX-LaTeX roundtrips fails for so > many languages. All work on tex2lyx maybe useless given that José said he is going to rewrite it in python. -- Enrico
