> Uwe, the problem is that you happily bash others with harsh manners,
> so you should not be surprised when you are paid with the same money.
> Please, don't give me lessons about gentlemanliness when there are
> posts in the archives demonstrating what a gentleman you are.
What do you mean? The only time I lost my contenance was when I attacked Edwin, which was not fair
and he kindly accepted my excuse. The rest were maybe hard, but fair discussions.
I prefer to speak out what I don't like than to laugh on somebody without
letting him know why.
But anyway,
> See, you still have a global variable but nonetheless you introduce
> two accessor functions to set and get its value, when it can still
> be freely referenced from everywhere.
I see. This code is not mine and I still don't know enough how correctly make it better and define
aa tex2lyx class. Angus proposed a possible solution, but I wont have the time to implement this
now. It would help if Peter, Angus, Abdel, you or whoever could do this. It seems for you it is only
some minutes, for me hours that I don't have.
This could be the start of a general tex2lyx cleanup and lead to the real goal to have Unicode also
for tex2lyx. Due to the lack of Unicode, LyX-LaTeX roundtrips fails for so many languages.
regards Uwe
