Bo Peng wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
Then what is in this user.bind? What exactly is the symptom?
This means this \unbind entry in user.bind does not have an
corresponding in the chosen bind file.
and.... ?
\bind "" "buffer-close"
wouldn't suffice to have no shortcut associated with buffer-close
I have explained in another thread that 'wildcard' operations like
that causes GUI troubles.
i read that, and i find this "wildcard" notion very strange. perhaps i
am overseeing something, but why don't we have an interface where
\bind "" "buffer-close"
simply means "there is no key binding associated with buffer-close" etc?
the fact that the gui becomes very complicated also suggests that
something is wrong since this stuff shouldn't be complicated.
imo the gui should simply list the available functions and their
associated keybindings and setting or removing a keybinding is at the
function level and therefore unambigous. these user set bindings then
override the system ones when they are loaded.
should we also add a "add length here... " in the length widget etc
If there is no label, sure.
that's why we use labels instead of subclassing a zillion widgets. i
took the liberty to commit this:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21254
Will save also 'apply'?
i would think so, yes. as i see it the apply/ok buttons enforce settings
within sessions and the save between sessions. the apply button is like
the ok button except that is doesn't close the dialog...
