Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> >>> I just now understand what you mean... But it is too late now to cure >>> that, maybe tomorrow... >> >> No worries :-) > > It was pretty easy to solve actually, the moment you know how to solve > it I mean...
I still think that it's more consistent to always pass around baseline y coordinates, even if this implies substracting/adding ascent a couple of times (0 performance impact I suppose). But I guess this is matter of preferences... A/
