Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> conveys all the information. I'm not religious about this, but now we >> have some methods that receive baselines and some others that receive >> frames... > > I will correct the remaining problems.
Ok. Note that I nobody disagrees with the general view (I don't know if I explained myself enough before). It's just that the baseline is as good as anything else for specifying the position of the frame (for instance, why don't we use bottom_y instead of top_y, no particular reason), and we use baseline everywhere [i.e. in the lyx sources, if the object has a Dimension, "y" == "baseline"]. So are we really sure this battle is worth fighting (I mean changing everything to understand top_y). A/
