Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
conveys all the information. I'm not religious about this, but now we
have some methods that receive baselines and some others that receive
frames...
I will correct the remaining problems.
Ok. Note that I nobody disagrees with the general view (I don't know if I
explained myself enough before).
I cannot parse what's above ;-)
It's just that the baseline is as good as
anything else for specifying the position of the frame (for instance, why
don't we use bottom_y instead of top_y, no particular reason),
Oh yes, there is a reason, we know where to start and that is the
top-left corner (i.e. y = 0). I grant you we could also draw from the
bottom but that would necessitate a lot of coordinate changing.
and we use
baseline everywhere [i.e. in the lyx sources, if the object has a
Dimension, "y" == "baseline"]. So are we really sure this battle is worth
fighting (I mean changing everything to understand top_y).
I think there is a misundertanding here... I agree that the baseline is
the reference and I did not change that philosophy I think. For me the
baseline is the baseline of the inset, not the baseline of the inner
Text. The fact that InsetCollapsable adjust its baseline to its inner
Text is just a special case.
Now, that's my turn to be unsure of the clarity of what I'm saying...
Abdel.
