On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:24:03AM +0200, Mael Hilléreau wrote: > Selon Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > ... On the other hand, there could be a much more simple solution: > > > > 1. Disable spellcheck for any code-inset (LyX code, listings...) -- perhaps > > it's already the case; > > I believe it is. > > > 2. Add only one checkbox to spellcheck dialog: something like "Spellcheck > > only > > (what goes to) output", or just "Ignore spellcheck for notes and disabled > > branches";
I want my disabled branches spellchecked. :-/ I write a test with hidden answers. I want to spellcheck everything, so I can print the answers later without further checking & editing. Still, I want some way of not spellchecking the acronyms and computer commands embedded in the text. A wish: Some solution for not spellchecking individual words like "emacs" will probably be implemented. Marking each word can be lots of work, depending on the text. The spellcheck dialog could have another button for "don't spellcheck this word again". (Surely with a shorter caption, but you get the idea.) That button would mark the word as not spellchecked, and the next time the spellchecker runs those words are skipped. Not because the spellchecker learned them, but because the document noted that they were special. (The same words occuring elsewhere may very well be caught by the spellchecker.) Helge Hafting
