Selon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> I like Helge's idea of having an easy way to mark a word/phrase as "do not > >> spellcheck e"... Maybe the word is a real word in some contexts, but not > >> in others, so I might not wan't it to be added to my personal dictionary. > > > > After all, why not... But if adding words to such a list is implemented, a > way > > removing them should be provided as well. > > I didn't understand him that way. I thought he meant that the specific > instanc of that word (and perhaps optionally all identical words) would be > marked as "do not spellcheck me". So there would be no list of words, > rather some (more) words that are marked as don't check. > > Does this make sense?
If it's just _one_ instance that we want to ignore, then we can use a charstyle or a special inset having keyword "NoSpellcheck" (this is already possible with the patch). If it's _all_ words identical, when running the spellchecker we have to check that every word to be spellchecked isn't marked somewhere as such, and so we need a list... Besides, it could be more simple to ignore such a list: just pass it to the spellchecker program; all have an option for ignoring some given words (e.g. "-W" for aspell). Mael.
