Selon Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > To character level?? I don't understand. The spellchecker allows to skip at > word > level. What we need is to skip some parts at a higher level: specific > instance > of an inset, or some type of inset (bugs 1042 and 1509 deal with this). > > IMO the inset-type level is more interesting: > > * on one hand, it could allow to ignore some inset types such as notes, > comments, code, etc. (this info could perhaps be stored into layout files); > > * and on the other hand, we could define a special inset to deal with > arbitrary > regions: it would only ignore spellchecking. This would need that its > instances > could incorporate (and be incorporated in) any kind of inset instance.
We could think of a more sophisticated behavior: in the layout files, the keyword (e.g. spellchecking) could store one of 3 values: on/off/select. "on": spellcheck the inset; "off": don't spellcheck the inset; and "select": choose from the spellchecking dialog whether to spellcheck or not. This would allow to enable/disable spellchecking at runtime for some document parts. However, I admit that this last proposal would probably need much more code to be written... The on/off values would be already great. Mael.
