Selon Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > We could think of a more sophisticated behavior: in the layout files, the > > keyword (e.g. spellchecking) could store one of 3 values: on/off/select. > "on": > > spellcheck the inset; "off": don't spellcheck the inset; and "select": > choose > > from the spellchecking dialog whether to spellcheck or not. > > Why does the term "gas plant" come to mind? ;)
Perhaps because this could become true if one would abuse of the select option :-) Ok, forget about it, but the on/off wouldn't be too much IMO. I always have to ignore misspelled words from notes; this is really annoying. However, that's my own usage of notes, and some other users would surely like to spellcheck notes. > I do not think we are looking for a "everything is customizable" > solution. Agreed. More and more things tend to be customizable into layout files. Nevertheless, that's no problem for the standard user because he/she won't have to worry about them. I keep thinking, however, that it wouldn't be much confusing to have a few checkboxes into the spellchecking dialog for enabling/disabling spellchecking of some standard layouts such as notes or comments. These could be hardcoded, I admit. Mael.
