Selon Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Selon Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > ... On the other hand, there could be a much more simple solution: > > > > 1. Disable spellcheck for any code-inset (LyX code, listings...) -- perhaps > > it's already the case; > > I believe it is.
No, in fact it wasn't the case with LyX-Code. I updated the patch so that LyX-Code paragraphs are no more spellchecked (see attached). > > 2. Add only one checkbox to spellcheck dialog: something like "Spellcheck > > only > > (what goes to) output", or just "Ignore spellcheck for notes and disabled > > branches"; > > The attached patch adds a checkbox to Preferences>Language > settings>Spellchecker > that allows enabling/disabling spellchecking for text not going to output > (notes > and disabled branches, actually). > > I'm not sure if we may consider that it solves bug 1509. > > > 3. Introduce something else to deal with instance level. IMHO a special > inset > > would be better than the language "none"... (less confusing: none ~ not > > foreign = document language) > > I'll let this one to someone else ;) This is bug 1042. > > > JMarc, not too much gas pipes in this plant, don't you think? ;) > > Comments are welcome :) I'd be happy if this would be sufficient for solving bug 1509 :) I'm waiting for your comments about this patch. JMarc? Mael.
spellcheck-only-output-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
