Georg Baum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2006 14:06 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hum, no objection but a more correct fix would have been to convert to
unicode.
Like the attached. Not the complete port but at least a first step ;-)
That is unfortunately no conversion to unicode. Lars used this construct
several times, but it is IMO cheating. We should eliminate all occurances
of
docstring(s.begin(), s.end())
where s is a std::string because this generates garbage for nonlatin1
input. That may explain the occasional "invalid char sequence" messages
from iconv.
Indeed. Another candidate for the Denmark meeting... You guys are not
going to be bored one second!
Abdel.
