Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2006 14:06 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > Hum, no objection but a more correct fix would have been to convert to > > unicode. > > Like the attached. Not the complete port but at least a first step ;-)
That is unfortunately no conversion to unicode. Lars used this construct several times, but it is IMO cheating. We should eliminate all occurances of docstring(s.begin(), s.end()) where s is a std::string because this generates garbage for nonlatin1 input. That may explain the occasional "invalid char sequence" messages from iconv. Georg