On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:21:48PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Abdelrazak> I don't care if it removed or not from SVN but I won't > Abdelrazak> touch one line of it from now on. > > This is where I disagree. We are not discussing the terms of a divorce > in front of lawyers. When I found problems with qt4 menu checked > boxen, I fixed them, because I knew how to do that. Not being a victim > of the old developers cabal does not mean be a lone cowboy. > > Abdelrazak> The only sane approach is then to provide two packages: > Abdelrazak> one statically linked to Qt4.2 and one dynamically linked > Abdelrazak> to it. > > Abdelrazak> This way, KDE4 users will enjoy sharing the same Qt4 with > Abdelrazak> LyX. For non-KDE4 user there is absolutely no drawback to > Abdelrazak> use a statically linked LyX except for a few additional > Abdelrazak> megabytes in memory. > > Three points: > > 1. who is going to do that? I still got no offer.
In case of 'emergency' I'll build Qt 4.<any_version> for any platform for which you can point me to a VMWare or Virtual PC style virtual machine on the net. Does that count as offer? Andre'
