>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:20:54AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: >> >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Andre> You'll get rid of Qt3 problems in exchange. >> Well, qt3 has no availability problem. Andre> You make this sound like there was an availability problem for Andre> Qt 4. In fact, Qt 4 is 'more' available as e.g. on Windows as Andre> there's an official GPL'ed version and it is closer to Standard Andre> C++ than 3 (pretty close actually when configured correctly). My problem is only with linux. Qt4 is the perfect match for windows and osx, IMO. >> As for technical problems, I would be surprised to hear that qt4 >> has less quirks then qt3. Andre> Qt 4 has a much cleaner, rather minimalistic interface as Andre> opposed to the ad-hoc collection of convenience functions that Andre> constitutes Qt 3, Andre> You are pretty close to spreading FUD here. I do not mean to disparage qt4, I have nothing against it. What I meant is that it probably has a number of bugs comparable to qt3. Andre> And you'll get better support from TT for 4 than for 3. >> Huh? I thought TT policy was "not a client? No support!" Andre> Interesting point that I can't check because they seemingly Andre> consider me a client. I usually get responses within a day when Andre> I use the official support channel and sometimes the customary Andre> open-source-style less-than-an-hour round-trip when adressing Andre> the right people directly. That is good indeed, but it is not what john experienced. JMarc
