>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I missed that then. Could you please repost in order to Abdelrazak> see what is really involved and what is so different WRT Abdelrazak> qt4? Here is what I wrote: ------------------------ I'll go one step further: I want to have a unix packaging maintainer for 1.5 (like we have for mac and windows) who is responsible for - coordinating the creation of spec files for .deb and .rpm - coordinating a network of people who can provide binaries for various platforms. - provide all necessary up to date resources (web pages, whatever) to help all unix user to get this qt4 thingy up and running in a way that is compatible with how the platforms normally works. This is more than the service we provide now for 1.4, but now is a good time to do it. -------------------------- As you see, I may have asked a bit more than what is really necessary, but these are the things I would like to see. Abdelrazak> That's not true, I am willing to accept some compromise Abdelrazak> (like 4.0 source compatibility). But you are right, if it Abdelrazak> was only me I would go for the latest and the greatest. I got mixed between what you are willing to accept and what you would like to do. What you propose here is fine with me. >> Maybe that if I said "let's stick to C++" you would say that you >> want to go to Qt's new java toolkit... Abdelrazak> That's not true. I love C++ and most of my work in this Abdelrazak> project was about real C++. Besides, C++ doesn't provide a Abdelrazak> GUI toolkit so your point is moot. We are friday, you know... I do not really believe that (even though we are friday, it is safer to make it clear!). JMarc
