>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Obviously as it is now qt4 will be the main lyx 1.5 frontend. But >> as you all now, with great powers come great responsibilities. Abdelrazak> First news! The second sentence or he first? Concerning the first, depending on what happens qt3 may be a main toolkit too... Abdelrazak> Obviously, the only logical decision to take now is to Abdelrazak> declare qt3 deprecated then. Not sure. Abdelrazak> I don't care if it removed or not from SVN but I won't Abdelrazak> touch one line of it from now on. This is where I disagree. We are not discussing the terms of a divorce in front of lawyers. When I found problems with qt4 menu checked boxen, I fixed them, because I knew how to do that. Not being a victim of the old developers cabal does not mean be a lone cowboy. Abdelrazak> The only sane approach is then to provide two packages: Abdelrazak> one statically linked to Qt4.2 and one dynamically linked Abdelrazak> to it. Abdelrazak> This way, KDE4 users will enjoy sharing the same Qt4 with Abdelrazak> LyX. For non-KDE4 user there is absolutely no drawback to Abdelrazak> use a statically linked LyX except for a few additional Abdelrazak> megabytes in memory. Three points: 1. who is going to do that? I still got no offer. 2. when proposed more liberty about qt4, your first reaction is to demand 4.2 only (which will probably become 4.3 only by the time 1/5 is released) 3. As Edwin said "there is no free lunch". JMarc
