Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Georg Baum wrote:
| > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| >> Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >> | Isn't this what svn, the version control system is for?
| >> | If the spellchecker is removed and the new one takes
| >> | "too much time", you can get impatient and revert the removal?
| > Exactly. Of course only if you don't combine several logocal
| > chanages in one
| > commit.
| >
| >> Bear in mind that this is not the only thing that will happen to the
| >> svn repo, so "rolling" back the changes can be quite cumbersome.
| > Why is this thing so difficult? It should be no problem to let Abdel
| > work on
| > the spell checker stuff exactly as he likes if he promises to finish it
| > completely, with configure support, preferences and all, and support for
| > aspell and ispell, either via enchant or directly in LyX, if it turns out
| > that enchant does not really work with one of these.
| > If he is willing to do that then I don't see any problem. If the bus thing
| > happens (which is not very likely after all), then reverting the whole
| > thing might still need a bit of work, but since we are not rewriting LyX
| > completely, only changing some interfaces at the moment, this additional
| > work will not be so much.
|
| At least someone who can think logically!
Yes, I have noticed that you enjoy arguments that fits your own
beliefs.
Would you like me to dislike arguments that I agree with?
We have tried the above, with the manpower we have, it does not really
work.
Year, I understand it's all about history... I understand that a big
trauma in the past just got some of you paranoid.
But I think it is time now to see it over fresh eyes and to allow some
more liberties in the LyX development model. I think manpower would come
naturally if you allow that more liberty.
Abdel.
