Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > Perhaps we should go that way anyway. If the underlying systems can | > support what we want (32bit char_types) then we use that, else we have | > to use our own solution. | | I dug out the patch. It will use wchar_t if it is a 32bit type. | Maybe we should eliminate hardcoded boost::uint32_t except in docstring.h | even if we don't use wchar_t. What do others think?
yes. We should just use lyx::char_type.
--
Lgb
