Hello,
I wonder what happened to the multibyte patch I sent a week ago. It has
never appeared in the Mail Archive. So I'm sending it again. It is against
the recent cvs source (Feb.8).
On 25 Jan 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Howdoes your package relates to those entries? Does it obsolete them
> or should I just add a third entry?
Since the patch is based on the Kawakami's, it somehow obsoletes the
Kawakami's patch, but the site seems contain useful informations for the
Japanese LyX users, I think a third entry would be appropriate. I have not
finished yet, but I am now trying to build the home page for the CJK-LyX
(I call this temporary multibyte lyx "CJK-LyX", if you don't mind, until
the codes become mature enough to be merged into the main cvs source).
>
> ChangGil Han> But the
> ChangGil Han> command "cvs diff -u -N" as instructed in the lyx web
> ChangGil Han> page, does not produce the correct patch file. After
> ChangGil Han> this command, the produced patch file misses files which
> ChangGil Han> are in my source directory, but not in the cvs source
> ChangGil Han> tree. Is there anyone who can give me the correct diff
> ChangGil Han> command? If any developers interested, I would like to
> ChangGil Han> summit the patch file against the recent cvs source.
>
> I am surprised that it does not work... We would of course be
> interested in having this patch and probably integrate it, if it does
> not cause problem in the basic LyX functionality.
>
I still cannot figure out why "cvs diff -u -N" drops the new files in my
source tree. Attached is my new patch. Since I'm no expert in C or C++,
there should be much room for improvement. Any comments or corrections
regarding the patch would be heartily appreciated.
regards,
ChangGil Han
lyx-devel-kr.diff.gz
